Gawker.com interviews CPUSA head, John Bachtell

 
BY:Hamilton Nolan| August 21, 2015
Gawker.com interviews CPUSA head, John Bachtell

(Editor’s note; This interview was orginally published under the title “Mistakes were made: A talk with the head of the Communist Party USA.)

The United States of America has a Communist Party. John Bachtell is its national chairman. We spoke to him about American politics, the mistakes of the Soviets, and communism’s “branding problem.”

Bachtell grew up in Ohio, with parents active in the civil rights and antiwar movement. He became interested in communism in college, and has been a member of the party since 1977. All the while, he’s been involved in political campaigns as well. We met him last week at the Communist Party USA’s headquarters on 23rd street in Manhattan to hear what modern American communism is all about. It’s not your daddy’s communism.

Gawker: Your involvement in electoral campaigns is mainly organizing for progressive Democrats?

John Bachtell: Yes, mainly progressive Democrats and independents at every level, whether it be city council, state rep, Senate, Presidential. I was really active in both Obama campaigns. Actually I was his precinct captain for his Senate campaign in Illinois.

Gawker: Do people ever reject your help because they don’t want the Communist Party associated with their campaigns?

JB: Not usually. I tend to be more tactical, so it doesn’t really become an issue. I don’t make it an issue-we don’t make it an issue. We’re all about coalition building in the electoral arena… It’s hard for us to run candidates that are not within the framework of either the Democratic Party, or independent politics.

Gawker: How has the party changed in the nearly 30 years you’ve been in it?

JB: I think we have gone through a lot of different changes. Unfortunately I think we’re a little smaller now than we were back in the 80s. There were huge setbacks that took place back in 1991, and that had a big impact on not only the Communist Parties around the world, socialist parties-it had a big impact on the labor movement. I don’t know that people fully appreciate the extent of that setback to mass movements. But certainly it had an impact on our party, and I’m not sure we’ve fully recovered from it. At the same time, it prompted us to embark on a very deep examination of our politics and organization, and since then we’ve been embarking on a lot of changes. We call them transformative changes that modernize the party, that make us a party of 21st century socialism, that bring us from the political margins into the political mainstream.

Gawker: And by that do you mean focusing more on coalitions with more mainstream movements on the left, or what?

JB: It entails first of all rooting ourselves in the political and economic realities of today. Our main strategic concept that we’ve been working with since 1980 is the rise of the right-the extreme right-its domination of politics in the US. That all rose with Reagan and the right wing takeover of the Republican party. And that’s been with us since then. We’ve seen it as recently as the last election cycle and everything that’s come out of that, and the domination of state governments by extreme right wing Republicans, and what they’ve been able to do on worker rights, women’s rights, voter suppression, and a whole bunch of different things. There’s a real threat to basic democratic rights as we see it. We were one of the very first organizations to sound the alarm and call for a very broad multi-class united front against the extreme right. And I think that’s been validated. Now it’s a very broadly accepted concept. But the extreme right’s not gonna be defeated without a multi-class movement that involves those sections of Wall Street that don’t go along with the Koch brothers; that also involves the labor movement, communities of color, women’s organizations, youth and students, and all the Democratic movements, immigrant rights, gay and lesbian rights, seniors, you name it. All have to be part of this. Otherwise we won’t be able to advance to any other stages of struggle in this country.

To read the rest of the interview  click here. 

 

Comments (7)

E.E.W. Clay | September 25, 2015 at 10:19 AM

The fifth word in the last comment should’ve been “baited” not “bated”. Thanks.

clay

E.E.W. Clay | September 21, 2015 at 1:29 PM

Perhaps John was a bit bated by the initial question from Gawker.com.
Is the best and correct answer from the Communists really that: “Yes, mainly progressive Democrats and independents at every level, rather it be city council, state rep, Senate, Presidential.”
Maybe if Gawker. com had asked if-“Your involvement in election campaigns is mainly organizing WITH progressive Democrats?”-this would have been a correct answer.
The Communists do not involve themselves FOR the Democrats-otherwise-why have a Communist Party, why not only a Democratic Party?
The Communists work with all progressives, independents, groups and even non-progressives, if it unifies by the principle of the maturing, militant, multi-racial, multi-national, multi-sexual working class coming into being, on the basis that capital is systematically enslaving this working class, to its finance, its jails, its information, its war, its slavish, outdated, passé and backwards thought, world-wide.
The process of the many coming together-the multiple billions- to break the stranglehold of the giant cartels, banks, financial conglomerates and holding companies is a very natural process, according to our great Lenin.
It is this positive, progressive thought and action that the communists bring to every country, for the good of every country, including its host country-it is because of this that the Communists in the U. S. work with the Democratic Party, all allies, all independents, to bring the massive fruit of the labor of the billions of lives, past and present, to the ownership and control of its source-the international working class-including the United States’ working class and the United States of America’s Communist Party.

E.E.W. Clay | September 21, 2015 at 1:25 PM

Perhaps John was a bit bated by the initial question from Gawker.com.
Is the best and correct answer from the Communists really that: “Yes, mainly progressive Democrats and independents at every level, rather it be city council, state rep, Senate, Presidential.”
Maybe if Gawker. com had asked if-“Your involvement in election campaigns is mainly organizing WITH progressive Democrats?”-this would have been a correct answer.
The Communists do not involve themselves FOR the Democrats-otherwise-why have a Communist Party, why not only a Democratic Party?
The Communists work with all progressives, independents, groups and even non-progressives, if it unifies by the principle of the maturing, militant, multi-racial, multi-national, multi-sexual working class coming into being, on the basis that capital is systematically enslaving this working class, to its finance, its jails, its information, its war, its slavish, outdated, passé and backwards thought, world-wide.
The process of the many coming together-the multiple billions- to break the stranglehold of the giant cartels, banks, financial conglomerates and holding companies is a very natural process, according to our great Lenin.
It is this positive, progressive thought and action that the communists bring to every country, for the good of every country, including its host country-it is because of this that the Communists in the U. S. work with the Democratic Party, all allies, all independents, to bring the massive fruit of the labor of the billions of lives, past and present, to the ownership and control of its source-the international working class-including the United States’ working class and the United States of America’s Communist Party.

| August 26, 2015 at 3:17 PM

He makes it sound like there’s no reason for the cpusa at all. He supports Obama, he reiterates the fight against the ultra right, he sounds like a progressive Democrat. Nothing about Marxian social science, just banal analyses you can find at the new republic. Maybe the cpusa has been coopted by the business party at last.

jules | August 24, 2015 at 10:27 AM

Nice insight by a veteran …. speaking from real life & day to day experiences.
Observer Jules

istiaque | August 22, 2015 at 1:54 AM

Good to see american communist party,,go ahead & bring it,,,long live revolution

Glen Salo | August 21, 2015 at 1:07 PM

I think its more basic that this. Marxism needs to break away from Leninism in order to reflect today’s realities. The fact is that Marx’s predictions are more and more one the verge of being realized.

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

For democracy. For equality. For socialism. For a sustainable future and a world that puts people before profits. Join the Communist Party USA today.

Join Now

We are a political party of the working class, for the working class, with no corporate sponsors or billionaire backers. Join the generations of workers whose generosity and solidarity sustains the fight for justice.

Donate Now

CPUSA Mailbag

If you have any questions related to CPUSA, you can ask our experts
  • QHow does the CPUSA feel about the current American foreign...
  • AThanks for a great question, Conlan.  CPUSA stands for peace and international solidarity, and has a long history of involvement...
Read More
Ask a question
See all Answer